Simmental Cattle
Also known as: simmental beef, sim cattle, red and white cattle, simmentaler
The Simmental breed simplifies management through its exceptional mothering ability and remarkable hardiness, thriving in challenging environments. Originating from Switzerland, these versatile cattle are also known for their excellent cold tolerance and good docility, making them a pleasure to work with. Simmentals excel at foraging on diverse pastures and demonstrate strong grazing adaptation, requiring minimal intervention for successful finishing on grass. Their inherent parasite resistance further reduces labor and input costs. These characteristics, combined with their proven ability to convert forage efficiently, make Simmentals an outstanding choice for farmers prioritizing robust, low-maintenance cattle that perform exceptionally well on pasture-based systems, particularly those utilizing rotational grazing practices.
Regenerative Quick Profile
Best Suited For
Climates: Temperate oceanic to humid continental, with tolerance for semi-arid conditions
Terrain: Adaptable to most terrain types
Scale: Suitable for small to medium operations (10-50 animals)
How These Traits Are Calculated
Trait dimensions are ordered clockwise starting from the top of the chart (12 o'clock position):
1. Financial Returns
Monthly income per animal after feed and care costs
WHAT: Evaluates net monthly profit by combining finish weight, time to market, price premiums, and input costs. Breeds with fast growth, efficient feed conversion, and premium market access generate higher returns per animal.
WHY: Farmers need clear income projections to sustain operations. Breeds returning $150+/month enable profitable small-scale operations, while those under $80/month require larger herds or alternative revenue streams to achieve viability.
HOW: Calculated from economics data (finish weight, months to finish, price premiums) combined with trait scores (feed efficiency, mothering ability, drought tolerance). Exceptional (≥2.6): fast growth ≤24 months + high capital efficiency >$180/month + low costs <30% of revenue. Typical (1.8-2.5): moderate returns or longer timelines. Limited (<1.8): slow growth >36 months or high input costs >50%.
2. Cost Efficiency
Feed, water, and input costs relative to output value
WHAT: Measures how well cattle convert inputs (pasture, hay, grain, water) into saleable output. Combines grass-finishing ability, feed efficiency, foraging capability, and water requirements into a composite efficiency score.
WHY: Input costs determine profitability more than market price. Breeds excelling on grass alone with minimal supplementation and low water needs reduce operating costs 40-60%, enabling viability even in drought years or when hay prices spike.
HOW: Weighted formula: grass finishing ability (30%), feed efficiency (30%), foraging ability (30%), water requirements inverted (10%). Exceptional (≥2.6): finishes on grass, exceptional feed conversion, thrives on rough forage. Typical (1.8-2.5): moderate efficiency, some grain needed. Limited (<1.8): grain-dependent, high inputs required.
3. Heat Tolerance
Performance in hot climates above 85°F (29°C)
WHAT: Evaluates breed adaptation to sustained heat above 85°F (29°C), measuring coat characteristics, metabolic adaptations, and documented performance in tropical or semi-arid regions.
WHY: Heat stress reduces feed intake 15-30%, lowers reproduction rates, and increases mortality. Heat-adapted breeds maintain productivity where others require expensive shade structures, cooling systems, or fail completely during summer peaks.
HOW: Rated from database trait 'heat_tolerance' based on breed characteristics. Exceptional (≥2.6): tropical origins, short sleek coats, proven success in regions >95°F (35°C). Typical (1.8-2.5): moderate tolerance, manageable with some shade. Limited (<1.8): temperate-adapted, struggles above 85°F without intensive cooling.
4. Cold Tolerance
Performance in cold climates below 20°F (-7°C)
WHAT: Evaluates breed adaptation to sustained cold below 20°F (-7°C), measuring coat thickness, body mass, metabolic efficiency, and documented performance in northern climates with harsh winters.
WHY: Cold stress increases feed requirements 20-40% for maintenance alone, elevates mortality in young stock, and complicates winter management. Cold-hardy breeds thrive outdoors year-round where others need expensive barns and supplemental heating.
HOW: Rated from database trait 'cold_tolerance' based on breed characteristics. Exceptional (≥2.6): northern origins, thick winter coats, proven success in regions <0°F (-18°C). Typical (1.8-2.5): moderate hardiness, windbreaks sufficient. Limited (<1.8): warm-adapted, requires shelter below 30°F (-1°C).
5. Management Ease
Temperament, handling requirements, and daily care needs
WHAT: Measures how straightforward cattle are to work with daily, combining temperament docility, calving ease, mothering ability, and fence respect into a management complexity score.
WHY: Difficult cattle increase labor 2-4× through longer handling times, more frequent escapes, calving interventions, and safety risks. Easy-handling breeds enable one-person operations and reduce stress for both farmer and animals.
HOW: Weighted formula: docility (40%), calving ease (30%), mothering ability (20%), fence respect (10%). Exceptional (≥2.6): calm docile temperament, unassisted calving, excellent mothers, respects basic fencing. Typical (1.8-2.5): manageable with experience. Limited (<1.8): nervous or aggressive, frequent interventions needed.
6. Drought & Disease Resilience
Survival and productivity under stress conditions
WHAT: Evaluates breed robustness across drought tolerance, parasite resistance, general hardiness, and disease resistance. Measures ability to maintain productivity when conditions deteriorate or health challenges arise.
WHY: Resilient breeds reduce veterinary costs 30-50%, survive drought years that devastate others, and maintain production through typical disease pressures. This determines whether you can sustain a herd through inevitable challenges or face repeated losses.
HOW: Weighted formula: drought tolerance (40%), parasite resistance (30%), general hardiness (20%), disease resistance (10%). Exceptional (≥2.6): thrives through drought, strong natural immunity, minimal interventions needed. Typical (1.8-2.5): moderate resilience, standard care sufficient. Limited (<1.8): requires intensive management to maintain health.
7. Farm Size Adaptability
Suitability across different farm scales and intensities
WHAT: Evaluates whether breeds work across small (1-10 head), medium (11-50 head), or large (50+ head) operations, considering size, handling needs, and infrastructure requirements.
WHY: Size mismatches create inefficiencies. Large commercial breeds overwhelm small pastures and facilities, while breeds requiring individual attention don't scale to large herds. Matching breed to scale prevents costly infrastructure changes or unmanageable daily workloads.
HOW: Matrix scoring based on breed size × small-scale suitability rating. Exceptional (≥2.6): adapts well to all scales or excels across 2+ scales. Typical (1.8-2.5): works best at specific scales. Limited (<1.8): narrow scale requirements, struggles outside optimal range.
8. Market Accessibility
Availability of buyers and premium market opportunities
WHAT: Evaluates market pathways by examining price premium potential, buyer network strength, and market accessibility. Inverted dimension where breeds requiring premiums to be viable score lower than those profitable at commodity prices.
WHY: Premium dependence creates risk. Breeds requiring 30-50% premiums need specialty buyers, direct marketing channels, and consumer education—adding 10-20 hours monthly overhead. Commodity-viable breeds sell through standard auctions with minimal marketing effort.
HOW: Inverted scoring: lower premiums = higher scores. Exceptional (≥2.6): profitable at commodity prices, sells through standard channels. Typical (1.8-2.5): moderate premium needs (10-20%), accessible specialty markets. Limited (<1.8): requires high premiums (30-50%), niche buyers, intensive marketing.
Regenerative Advantages
- Efficiency: Simmental cattle excel at converting feed into high-quality beef and substantial milk, particularly in continental crosses, due to their rapid growth and muscling.
- Dual Purpose: Older European lines are renowned for exceptional beef muscling and significant milk production without compromising either trait.
- Feed Conversion: Simmentals exhibit exceptional feed conversion for both growth and milk production, leveraging their rapid development and muscling.
Know the Debate
- Genetics importance: EPDs vs. visual assessment for regen cattle.
- Simmentals adaptable but context critical for regenerative success.
- Prioritize fertility, efficiency, and environment fit.
- Crossbreeding enhances traits, suitability varies.
Value Streams
- Meat production
- Nutrient cycling and soil building
- Grassland management through grazing
- Carbon sequestration in grasslands
Experience Level
Some livestock experience recommended
3
Understanding Simmental Cattle Characteristics
Physical traits, temperament, and what makes this breed unique
Understanding Simmental Cattle Characteristics
Physical traits, temperament, and what makes this breed unique
Simmental cattle, originating from the Simme Valley in Switzerland, are one of the oldest and most versatile European breeds. Initially developed as a dual-purpose animal for both milk and meat production, they are recognized for their large size, muscular build, and typically reddish-gold or yellow and white coloration, though black and white variations also exist. Their distinctive appearance often includes a white face, similar to the Charolais, and a deep, broad body. These cattle are known for their rapid growth rates and excellent muscling, making them highly sought after for beef production.
What truly sets Simmentals apart is their impressive genetic diversity and adaptability. Over centuries, they have been selectively bred for traits like fertility, longevity, and docility, alongside their meat and milk qualities. This has resulted in a breed that can excel in various climates and management systems. Their inherent hardiness and ability to convert forage efficiently are key characteristics that have contributed to their global popularity and integration into many different cattle programs.
Compared to more specialized breeds, Simmentals offer a unique blend of productivity and robustness. While some breeds might focus solely on extreme maternal traits or rapid finishing, Simmentals provide a balanced package. They are not just meat producers; their genetic foundation allows for significant contributions to maternal lines, calving ease in crossbreeding, and a general resilience that is invaluable in less intensively managed environments. This makes them a pragmatic choice for farmers seeking multiple benefits from a single breed.
Sources behind this view
Research
-
A Reference Genome Assembly of Simmental Cattle, <i>Bos taurus taurus</i> (opens in new window)
A detailed genetic map (ARS_Simm1.0) for Simmental cattle was created, contributing to a larger project mapping genetic diversity across cattle breeds. This aids understanding of cattle variation for
4
Know the Debate
Selecting Simmental cattle or their genetics for regenerative systems involves weighing their inherent qualities against environmental fit and mana...
Know the Debate
Selecting Simmental cattle or their genetics for regenerative systems involves weighing their inherent qualities against environmental fit and mana...
Selecting Simmental cattle or their genetics for regenerative systems involves weighing their inherent qualities against environmental fit and management goals. Academic research highlights their genetic diversity and crossbreeding potential, while field experience emphasizes traits like fertility, moderate size, and adaptability for low-input pasture-based operations. The 'best' genetics depend on your specific context, including climate, forage availability, operational scale, and desired outcomes, suggesting a nuanced approach rather than a one-size-fits-all recommendation.
What genetics and traits matter most for regenerative cattle?
Objective Data & Breed Suitability
Focus on quantitative genetic markers (EPDs, genomics) for fertility, calving ease, and growth rate. Breed suitability should be evaluated based on regional climate and management goals, with research guiding optimal choices.
Sources behind this view
Sources behind this view
Research
-
Comparison of growth traits of eight beef cattle breeds in the Czech Republic (opens in new window)
This study found: Abstract. Eight beef cattle breeds, Angus (A), Blonde d' Aquitaine (BA), Charolais (C), Czech Pied (CP), Hereford (H), Limousin (L), Piemontese (P) and Simmental (S), were analysed for the following calf traits: birth weight (BW), 210- and 365-day weight ( 210W, 365W) and average daily gains from birth to 210 days (ADG1), from 210 to 365 days (ADG2) and from birth to 365 days (ADG3). Phenotypic parameters were estimated by linear model procedures including the fixed effects of year of birth (1992–1998), herd, sex (male, female), calf number (single, twin), parity and random sire effects. Literature values of heritability estimates were used to derive genetic standard deviations and genetic range for comparison of genetic variation within and between breeds. The means of Blonde d' Aquitaine were highest for all growth traits except for BW, followed by Charolais and Simmental, then Angus, Czech Pied and Limousin with intermediate values and Piemontese and Hereford with lowest growth except for BW in Piemontese and ADG1 in Hereford. Blonde d' Aquitaine also showed high standard deviations for most growth traits except for BW, whereas for Limousin and Piemontese low standard deviations were estimated and for other breeds no consistent pattern was observed. Coefficients of variation were generally high for Hereford and low for Angus. Hypothetical frequency curves were used for comparison of genetic variation within breeds and between breeds. Comparison of extreme and average breeds showed ranges of genetic levels between 79 and 154 % of the average breed level thus indicating the large overall genetic variation for growth traits in beef cattle. Between-breed selection with immediate impact, but steady erosion by time, as well as within-breed selection with slow but steady increase and renewed variation should both be applied for optimal exploitation of genetic resources in the beef industry.
-
Variance components using genomic information for 2 functional traits in Italian Simmental cattle: Calving interval and lactation persistency. (opens in new window)
This study found: Researchers studied Italian Simmental dairy cows to improve breeding for traits like fertility and how long cows maintain milk production after their peak yield. They used genetic information from over 7,000 cows and a large family history database. Calving interval, a measure of fertility, had low heritability (meaning genetics play a small role). Milk persistency also showed low heritability but was more influenced by genetics than calving interval. While genetics for these traits are weak, the study suggests that including them in breeding programs could still lead to improvements over time, especially by using genetic data on young animals. There was a slight genetic link between better calving intervals and better milk persistency.
From the Web
-
Guide to selecting beef bulls: align traits with market and environment, prioritize EPDs (calving ease, birth weight, etc.), ensure functional traits and soundness, require BSE and quarantine, and utilize genomic-enhanced EPDs and selection indexes.
-
Effective cattle breeding programs are key to commercial production. This cluster details selecting replacement heifers based on desirable genetic characteristics and lists major dairy breeds, with a growth chart provided by Penn State Extension for breed standard comparison.
On-Farm Observation & Adaptability
Prioritize visual assessment of fertility, longevity, and environmental adaptability observed in practical settings. Experienced farmers favor traits like moderate size, docility, and efficient forage conversion for regenerative systems.
Sources behind this view
Sources behind this view
Videos & Podcasts
-
Selecting cattle for fertility and calving ease involves assessing traits like muzzle width, pin bone width, pelvic opening, tail process angle, and hide folds. Efficient cows have bigger bellies than heart girth and angled last ribs. The speaker references historical texts and personal experience, highlighting the importance of visual assessment and understanding genetic influences on fertility and efficiency.
-
Select beef animals based on breed (Angus common), deep body (50%+ height), good muscling, and moderate frame. Utilize EPDs for genetic prediction and visually confirm phenotype matches genotype.
From the Web
-
Prioritizes longevity, adaptability, fertility, and soundness in livestock genetic selection, particularly for beef cattle. Recommends practical, on-farm observation over catalog data for breeding stock, emphasizing that non-breeding females and underperforming bulls can be finished for meat, ensuring financial return.
-
Regenerative ranching emphasizes grazing management, not specific breeds. Desirable cows fit their environment, are moderate in size (1,000-1,200 lbs), efficient in reproduction and forage use, and rebreed annually. Crossbreeding for heterosis is beneficial. Moderate milking ability and alignment with peak forage production are key.
Making Sense of the Differences
The ideal cattle genetics for regenerative systems balance objective data with practical on-farm observations. Traits like fertility, adaptability to local environments, and efficient forage utilization are paramount to success. While EPDs provide valuable metrics, experienced producers often look to visual cues and herd longevity for insight into an animal's true performance. Crossbreeding with adapted breeds or composites can enhance hardiness and productivity, ensuring cattle thrive with minimal inputs and contribute positively to land health.
Are Simmental cattle the best choice for regenerative systems?
Valuable for Adaptability and Crossbreeding
Simmentals offer rapid growth, good muscling, and genetic diversity, making them beneficial for crossbreeding programs. Their adaptability and solid maternal traits contribute to herd efficiency and productivity in various environments.
Sources behind this view
Sources behind this view
Research
-
A Reference Genome Assembly of Simmental Cattle, <i>Bos taurus taurus</i> (opens in new window)
This study found: Scientists have created a detailed genetic map (genome assembly) for Simmental cattle, a breed known for its fast growth and meat production, with over 50 million animals worldwide. This new map, called ARS_Simm1.0, is a high-quality reference that captures the genetic blueprint of this specific cow. It's part of a larger project, the Bovine Pangenome Consortium, aiming to map the genetic diversity across many different cattle breeds. Having these detailed genetic maps helps researchers understand variations within cattle populations, which can be crucial for breeding and improving livestock health and productivity.
-
Variance components using genomic information for 2 functional traits in Italian Simmental cattle: Calving interval and lactation persistency. (opens in new window)
This study found: Researchers studied Italian Simmental dairy cows to improve breeding for traits like fertility and how long cows maintain milk production after their peak yield. They used genetic information from over 7,000 cows and a large family history database. Calving interval, a measure of fertility, had low heritability (meaning genetics play a small role). Milk persistency also showed low heritability but was more influenced by genetics than calving interval. While genetics for these traits are weak, the study suggests that including them in breeding programs could still lead to improvements over time, especially by using genetic data on young animals. There was a slight genetic link between better calving intervals and better milk persistency.
From the Web
-
Utilize crossbreeding and artificial insemination (AI) in beef cattle to improve herd efficiency by combining breed strengths, leveraging heterosis, and accessing superior genetics for better replacement heifers and growth performance.
-
Effective cattle breeding programs are key to commercial production. This cluster details selecting replacement heifers based on desirable genetic characteristics and lists major dairy breeds, with a growth chart provided by Penn State Extension for breed standard comparison.
Considerations for Low-Input Regenerative Systems
Simmentals' large size may require careful management for optimal fertility and efficiency in low-input systems. Some farmers prefer smaller, more efficient composites or continental breeds for hardiness and reduced input needs in regenerative settings.
Sources behind this view
Sources behind this view
Videos & Podcasts
-
Alex Johnston aims to replace large Simmental cross cows with 1300 lb, forage-efficient Angus-influenced cattle at his Scottish estate to improve fertility, carcass weight, and reduce wintering costs, utilizing kale for extended grazing.
-
Moe's feedlot explores diverse cattle genetics, including Jersey crosses and dairy beef, alongside efficient facility design (monoslope barn, silencer chute) for calm and effective animal handling and data collection.
From the Web
-
Guide to selecting 'regenerative cows' based on environmental fit, balanced maternal/terminal traits, moderate size, moderate milking, heterosis from crossbreeding, overall efficiency, and calf health. Specific breed examples are provided for each consideration.
-
Starting a beef herd involves choosing between cow-calf, backgrounding, or feedlot operations. Producers must also decide on purebred vs. commercial cattle, select breeds like Black Angus or Hereford, and establish a reproductive plan.
Making Sense of the Differences
Simmental cattle add value through adaptability and crossbreeding potential, enhancing growth and maternal traits. However, their larger frame requires management considerations for optimal fertility and efficiency in low-input grazing systems, where smaller or composite breeds may offer advantages. Successful integration often involves strategic selection within the Simmental breed or crossbreeding to balance productivity with hardiness and resilience to environmental factors.
5
Management, Care & Feeding
Operational guidance for raising this breed successfully
Management, Care & Feeding
Operational guidance for raising this breed successfully
Managing Simmental cattle effectively in a regenerative system emphasizes pasture utilization and minimal intervention. Their dietary needs are primarily met through high-quality forages. Rotational grazing is crucial to ensure they graze diverse pastures efficiently, promoting plant regrowth and soil health. Providing access to clean water and mineral supplements is essential, especially during different physiological stages like lactation or gestation. Due to their size and growth potential, ensuring adequate pasture biomass is available, particularly during peak growth periods, will maximize their performance and minimize the need for concentrates.
Health management for Simmentals should focus on preventative care and robust genetics. Their natural hardiness means they are generally less susceptible to common ailments compared to some other breeds, but regular observation is still necessary. Vaccination programs tailored to regional risks and maintaining a clean environment are standard practices. Given their potential for rapid growth, monitoring for metabolic issues, especially in high-producing cows or rapidly finishing steers, is prudent. Selecting for calving ease, particularly in heifers and first-calf cows, through careful bull selection and potentially using calving ease-focused genetics, is a key aspect of responsible breeding.
When considering Simmentals for crossbreeding, their ability to impart desirable traits like muscle development, growth rate, and fertility is a major advantage. Using Simmental bulls on British breeds can result in calves with increased hybrid vigor and market-ready weight. Conversely, using Simmental females can introduce strong maternal qualities and milk production into continental or British crosses. Regardless of the crossbreeding strategy, maintaining detailed records on calving ease, weaning weights, and overall herd health will allow farmers to fine-tune their breeding program and select the best animals for genetic advancement within their regenerative operation.
Sources behind this view
Videos & Podcasts
-
Alex Johnston aims to replace large Simmental cross cows with 1300 lb, forage-efficient Angus-influenced cattle at his Scottish estate to improve fertility, carcass weight, and reduce wintering costs,
-
John Simmons advocates for maternal bull genetics and strategic marketing of heifers, noting that smaller, grass-fed calves can be more valuable per head. He highlights the market shift towards breeds
7
Production Capabilities & Market Economics
Business case evaluation and production metrics
Production Capabilities & Market Economics
Business case evaluation and production metrics
Meat Production Economics
| Category | Value |
|---|---|
| Finish Weight | 1100-1400 lbs 499-635 kg |
| Months to Finish | 24-30 |
| Price Premium | Market price |
| Annual Input Cost/Head | $400-600 |
| DTC Retail Price | $9.50-13.50 |
| Hanging Weight Yield | 58-62 |
| Packaged Meat per Animal | 450-600 lbs 204-272 kg |
| Processing Cost | $850-1300 |
| Gross DTC Revenue | $4275-8100 |
Finish Weight: Market weight for grass-finished cattle. Varies by breed genetics, frame size, and forage quality. Smaller-framed heritage breeds typically finish at 900-1100 lbs vs. 1200-1400 lbs for larger commercial breeds.
Months to Finish: Time from weaning to finish weight on grass alone (no grain). Grass-finishing takes 24-30 months vs. 14-18 months for grain-finished feedlot cattle. Patient timeline suits regenerative grazing operations.
Price Premium: Premium above conventional beef prices ($0-6/lb range). Grass-finished beef typically sells for $6-12/lb vs. $4-6/lb for conventional. Premium only applies when farm qualifies through certification (organic, grass-fed verified, Animal Welfare Approved) or direct marketing establishes provenance. Without certification or direct sales channels, premium falls to $0.
Annual Input Cost/Head: Minerals, health care, pasture maintenance, and winter hay per animal per year. Excludes infrastructure, land, and labor. Grass-based systems have minimal input costs compared to grain finishing.
DTC Retail Price: Direct-to-consumer retail price range per pound of packaged beef (cuts average). Grass-finished DTC beef typically sells for $8-14/lb across all cuts. Breed reputation, marbling quality, and local market demand drive variation. Prices reflect farm-gate or farmers market sales — wholesale and commodity channels are significantly lower.
Hanging Weight Yield: Percentage of live weight retained as hanging carcass (after hide, head, organs removed). Most cattle dress out at 58-64% of live weight. Leaner grass-finished cattle may hang slightly lower than grain-finished. Breed frame size and condition affect yield.
Packaged Meat per Animal: Take-home meat after cutting and wrapping (typically 60-65% of hanging weight). Bone-in cuts yield more weight than boneless. Final packaged weight depends on cut sheet choices — ground beef maximizes total pounds, premium steaks reduce total weight but increase per-pound value.
Processing Cost: USDA-inspected slaughter, cutting, wrapping, and labeling per animal. Costs vary by region and processor availability — rural areas with more processors tend to be cheaper. Includes kill fee ($75-150), cut-and-wrap ($0.65-1.10/lb hanging), and any specialty processing (jerky, sausage). USDA inspection required for retail sales; custom-exempt processing costs less but meat cannot be resold.
Gross DTC Revenue: Total revenue per animal when selling all cuts direct to consumer. Calculated from packaged weight × average DTC price per pound. Does not deduct processing, marketing, delivery, or production costs. Actual net profit depends heavily on marketing efficiency and processing costs.
Sources behind this view
Videos & Podcasts
-
For profitable grass-finished beef, select appropriate genetics (smaller frame size, e.g., 1200-1300 lb bulls) and focus on animal performance. Larger frame animals often require supplemental feed and
-
Grass-finishing mechanics involve using quality genetics on planted forages in irrigated circles, with daily moves to ensure optimal nutrient intake. Animals are finished to 1200-1250 lbs, aiming for
-
Explains how finishing speed, genetics, soil fertility, pasture diversity, and proper processing are crucial for high-quality grass-finished beef. Addresses issues like cold shortening and the importa
-
Achieve profitable grass-finished beef by focusing on low cost of production through good pasture management, single-mob grazing, and ensuring animals have healthy digestive systems and shed winter co
Community
-
Conventional beef systems yield standardized, higher-quality carcasses compared to grass-fed systems, which have variable harvest ages and lower marbling. While grass-fed beef has more omega-3s, conve
Read more (opens in new window) ucanr.edu -
Grass-finishing is the final fattening stage before slaughter, requiring target weight and minimal stress. While forage quality impacts fat profile and flavor, achieving tender, flavorful beef relies
Read more (opens in new window) permies.com
Research
-
Grass-fed vs. grain-fed beef systems: performance, economic, and environmental trade-offs. (opens in new window)
California study found conventional beef had better carcass quality and lower GHG emissions, while grass-fed systems had varied water/energy use and higher costs. No single system was superior across
-
Growth curve, blood parameters and carcass traits of grass-fed Angus steers. (opens in new window)
Grass-fed Angus steers took 188 days longer to market with 70% slower weight gain than grain-fed, but produced similar tenderness and better yield grades, though grain-fed had higher quality grades.
-
Integrated metabolomic and transcriptome analyses reveal finishing forage affects metabolic pathways related to beef quality and animal welfare. (opens in new window)
Grass-finished beef is more tender, has better fat profiles (more omega-3s), and comes from less stressed animals compared to grain-finished beef, according to gene and body chemistry analysis.
-
Net protein contribution and enteric methane production of pasture and grain-finished beef cattle supply chains. (opens in new window)
Australian study: Grass-fed beef is far more efficient at producing human-usable protein than grain-finished beef, but grass-fed systems have higher methane emissions per unit of protein.